On Tuesday 26 June 2001 10:26 am, you wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:54:47AM -0500, AAAunderground wrote: > > alias eth0 ne io=0x240 > > > > > alias eth1 ne io=0x240 > > > > Even though I don't understand why I wouldn't use 340 I tried 240 twice > > and that did not work. > > Now, I don't understant it either :(... Sorry for the wrong info. > > From now on I will refrain giving hardware-related advice after 11 pm. > > alias eth0 ne io=0x240 > alias eth1 ne io=0x340 > > florin /etc/modules.conf alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc alias usb-controller usb-uhci alias eth0 ne io=0x240 alias eth1 ne io=0x340 options ne io=0x240 irq=9 options ne io=0x340 irq=5 I have tried various combinations of this. I added the irq's for fun. I have also rm the ifcf-eth1 from the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts folder and created a new one. Linux keeps telling me that it is delaying initialization. I know both cards work. They must have a complex about working together. Maybe they just need a motivational speech or something. -- Spencer Underground mailto:spencer at sihope.com deltree c:\windows /y whois microsoft.com -------------- next part -------------- alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc alias usb-controller usb-uhci alias eth0 ne io=0x240 alias eth1 ne io=0x340 options ne io=0x240 irq=9 options ne io=0x340 irq=5