Dave Sherohman <esper at sherohman.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:22:49AM -0500, andy at theasis.com wrote: > > > That is pretty interesting. Microsoft, despite their claims, is > > > using GPL'd software. > > > > The article says M$ using FreeBSD. Not GPL. > > That was my first thought as well, but Brian then went on to talk about > forged headers from apache (claiming to be IIS, perhaps?) and a version > of IIS 4.0 running on linux. Those are definitely usages of GPLed code, > plus there's the possibility that the FreeBSD distribution includes some > GPLed utilities or libraries, though I don't know FreeBSD well enough > to comment on its actual purity; it could be 100% BSDL code or it could > be a mix. Um, Apache is under a BSD(-style?) license. OTOH, gcc is quite popular ;-) -- _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ Batteries not included. / \/ \(_)| ' // ._\ / - \(_)/ ./| ' /(__ \_||_/|_||_|_\\___/ \_-_/|_|\__\|_|_\ __) [ Mike Hicks | http://umn.edu/~hick0088/ | mailto:hick0088 at tc.umn.edu ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010618/cffd47f5/attachment.pgp