Having just read the article, I find myself wondering...

He got paid to write an article that short and lacking in content?
Editorial or no, I would generally expect a bit more information than the
8 paragraphs he wrote.  If he's going to offer a contrary opinion, he
could at least back it up with something.  He comes off as being contrary
just for the sake of being contrary.

--
Michael Vieths
Foeclan at Winternet.Com

On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Jack Ungerleider wrote:

> Warning: The following was set of by an article in Network World Fusion that 
> can be found at:
> 
> http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2001/0604kearns.html
> 
> Jack