* Robert P. Goldman <goldman at htc.honeywell.com> [010604 09:21]: > 2. Subjective impression of better UI. For example, at least at the > most recent Gnome I tried, their help browser had no search feature! whatis: is what your looking for. Took me 3 seconds in the gnome help to find that. > This seems totally goofy to me. gnorpm has a UI that I find almost > totally inscrutable, etc., etc. rpm's blow :) Progeny has some nifty gnome-based utilities for managing package sets, but for package-stuff-munging dselect still rules all. :) > centered around konqueror, which I feel to be the best browser Uhhh. ok. It cant do the CSS i spew, nor does it have full emcascript support. :) Plus, mozilla .9 and beyond are getting pretty amazingly fast. Plus, I dont have to load a huge amount of KDE libs for only one application. -- Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> <sdier at debian.org> http://www.ringworld.org/ #linuxos at irc.openprojects.net Sinclair: "No boom?" Garibaldi: "No boom." Ivanova: "No boom today. Boom tomorrow. Always a boom tomorrow." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010604/f0531450/attachment.pgp