On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Mike Hicks wrote: > Phil Mendelsohn <mend0070 at tc.umn.edu> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Daniel Taylor wrote: > > > > > The GPL specifies source release, you didn't think I wanted all of my > > > compensation for the code I write in _money_ did you? > > > Getting code in exchange for code is a pretty decent deal in my book. > > > > Can be. But code parity isn't always easy to establish, and you feel > > gypped in a non-parity transaction of any sort! > > Hmm.. Perhaps, though I've obtained this entire operating system for > (nearly) free. I think I'm the one that's behind when it comes to > parity.. No, that's the "free as in air" part of the GPL. You can't be behind, on a GPL trade, ever. GPL gives it away even if noone wants it.<g> Or if everyone wants it. -- "To misattribute a quote is unforgivable." --Anonymous