Phil Mendelsohn <mend0070 at tc.umn.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Daniel Taylor wrote: > > > The GPL specifies source release, you didn't think I wanted all of my > > compensation for the code I write in _money_ did you? > > Getting code in exchange for code is a pretty decent deal in my book. > > Can be. But code parity isn't always easy to establish, and you feel > gypped in a non-parity transaction of any sort! Hmm.. Perhaps, though I've obtained this entire operating system for (nearly) free. I think I'm the one that's behind when it comes to parity.. -- _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ An unbreakable toy is / \/ \(_)| ' // ._\ / - \(_)/ ./| ' /(__ useful for breaking \_||_/|_||_|_\\___/ \_-_/|_|\__\|_|_\ __) other toys. [ Mike Hicks | http://umn.edu/~hick0088/ | mailto:hick0088 at tc.umn.edu ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010705/f9c4f1fd/attachment.pgp