> >Likewise. Are you saying it works as a module? UMSDOS seems to be mostly > >unmaintained lately. > > I don't recall if I tried it as a module or not. I try not to use modular > kernels, so I don't normally consider that option. Well if it doesn't work as a module then I'd say its just plain broken. > >When are we going to get vfat support? ;P > > Eh? There's vfat in 2.2.x afaik.. and in 2.4.x. Are you pulling my leg? :) Last I tried (2.2.14ish) mounting a vfat FS as umsdos lost all the long filenames. Having umsdos and vfat long filenames maintained simultaniously would really be handy. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe at mn-linux.org For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help at mn-linux.org