On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Austad, Jay wrote: > For the most part, the NAT capabilities in the 675 work, but the amount of > stuff you can really do with it sucks. OK, I'll buy that. I'm not opposed to rolling my own firewall. It's just a matter of how much time I have to devote to the effort. That brings up the next question. Do I need a dedicated firewall sitting between the 675 and my switch (I ordered a NetGear FS105 from mwave.com yesterday) or can I use the server that I plan to use for Web and email and put two NICs in it to achieve the same effect? (At least I think that second option would work.) Comments? -Tim -- Tim Wilson | Visit Sibley online: | Check out: Henry Sibley HS | http://www.isd197.k12.mn.us/ | http://www.zope.org/ W. St. Paul, MN | | http://slashdot.org/ wilson at visi.com | <dtml-var pithy_quote> | http://linux.com/