Quoting Adam Maloney (adamm at sihope.com): > I wouldn't have a problem using the 675 to do the NAT, but I wouldn't use > it as the firewall just because it's not powerful/configurable enough. I > have a routed block so I'm not doing NAT, but none of my customers have > any problems with it. Some of them are even doing some pretty complicated > static NAT entries. Unless things have changed the 675 does not do NAT, it only does PAT, thus it forces you to have an intern LAN of 10.0.0.1. -- Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (612)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org | Fax : (612)943-8500 Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9