On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:49:29AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: >On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:40:23AM -0600, Ben Lutgens wrote: > >Interesting... multipart/signed is plain text, but multipart/alternative >isn't... > The keyword there is alternative, in order to read the text I need to use another menu and explicitly "view" the attached text. My multipart doesn't make up the body because my mailer complies with the RFC standards for exchangine encrypted email. In fact the guy who wrote my mailer also wrote one of those RFCs. You do know what an RFC is don't you? It's a generally accepted (can't remeber rfc number) way to sign messages. and it doesn't make it impossible for people to read the mail easily. When you windows users send mail to a linux related list, and someone like me who uses mutt tries to read that mail, there is no proper "body" of the message. Hence we have to view the attachments. It's irritating, and I asked you nicely to please post in plain text to the list. I don't think that's too much to ask. It might take you a second or two to set the address for the list to "Send plain text only" in your address book. -- Ben Lutgens cell: 612.670.4789 http://www.sistina.com/ Sistina Software Inc. work: 612.379.3951 Code Monkey Support (A.K.A. System Administrator) Key fingerprint = A69A 118D 710B 8EB0 DC3B D912 2F19 311A 02DD 1908 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20001201/94100782/attachment.pgp