Re: [TCLUG:22786] RAID levels (Was: [TCLUG:22757] Raid and otherstorage stories)

[<Nick.T.Reinking@supervalu.com>]

Actually, both are the correct usage.  So settle down.  :P

It's nice to see that with IDE RAID, we're actually getting back
to "inexpensive".

Nick





dopp@acm.cs.umn.edu, on 10/17/2000 03:23:54 PM
To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org @ PMDF
cc:  
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:22786] RAID levels (Was: [TCLUG:22757] Raid and other 
storage stories)

On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 03:22:22PM -0500, Jason J wrote:
> Redundant Array of "Independent" Disks
> 
> 
No, Andy was right... It's inexpensive.  It come from back in the day when
a 1 GIG drive, for example, was << in price than, say, a 10 GIG drive.  
So, you could maybe buy 20 1 GB drives for the price of a single 10 GB.

Gabe

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gabe Turner                                    |           X-President,
UNIX Systems Administrator,                    | Assoc. for Computing Machinery
U of M Supercomputing Institute for            |    Univerisity of Minnesota
Digital Simulation and Advanced Computation    |       dopp@acm.cs.umn.edu

"I'm gonna be a monkey.  Monkey, monkey, monkey......"
                                        - Stimpy in "Monkey See, Monkey Don't"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org