Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc
From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:06:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <970519386.39d8f35a11182@www.fandre.com>; from clay@fandre.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:43:06PM -0500
References: <20001002152400.K14394@real-time.com> <00c501c02cb0$20fc0f30$ea6810ac@psinetcs.com> <970519386.39d8f35a11182@www.fandre.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:43:06PM -0500, Clay Fandre wrote:
> Quoting "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>:
> 
> > They probably won't have the architecture dependent patches that
> > purtain to the SPARC processors included in the SRPMS. So ... they
> > may not compile.  How about S.U.S.E.?
> 
> The sparc-debian distro has been working great for me. Plus you
> would make (idiot) Ben happy.

He he he...  Do I detect a soon-to-be Debian convert? ;-)

-- 
  Chad "^chewie, gunnarr" Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>
              http://wookimus.net/chewie

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc
  - From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>

References:
- Redhat and Sparc
  - From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc
  - From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
- Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc
  - From: Clay Fandre <clay@fandre.com>

Prev by Date: Cube Cases?
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:22008] Cube Cases?
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:21965] Redhat and Sparc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread