TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:21873] New Thread: desktop vs. wm (WAS Re: [TCLUG:21837] Your guys'/gals' favorite GUI/WM)
- To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
- Subject: Re: [TCLUG:21873] New Thread: desktop vs. wm (WAS Re: [TCLUG:21837] Your guys'/gals' favorite GUI/WM)
- From: Kent Schumacher <kent@structural-wood.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 08:29:07 -0500
- References: <39D52462.99208708@uswest.net> <20000930094246.A60491@sorry.cs.umn.edu> <39D5FF80.E23865E2@uswest.net> <39D62C6F.4D0F883C@uswest.net>
- Sender: kent@ann.skypoint.net
I use fvwm2 at work, gnome at home. When I setup a newbie Windows
convert I give the KDE.
Running any app on any window manager works fine, and there is so little
real difference between the different widget sets who can really care?
I run gnome apps, kde apps, raw X apps, CDE apps. What difference does
it make?
Nick B wrote:
>
> (I hate to sound like I'm spamming, but...)
>
> Tryout KDE 2.0. Its probably one of the coolest GUI's I've ever ran
> across. Not much competes with it.
>
> /me kills Gnome after seeing its horad GTK widgets
>
> Dave Sherman wrote:
>
> > Up until now, I've been running kde 1 and it works fine. But I'm
> > thinking of switching to AfterStep. I know I will lose some of the
> > "integrated desktop" functionality, but I really don't use it much
> > anyway -- most of my work is done in an xterm.
> >
> > Any opinions on full desktop environs vs. "plain" window managers?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > dopp@acm.cs.umn.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > Hands down: Fvwm2. Windowmaker comws in a close second.
> > >
> > > Gabe
> > >