Re: [TCLUG:17600] Compact Slackware

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:17600] Compact Slackware
From: Callum Lerwick <lerwick@tcfreenet.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 16:20:36 -0500
Organization: Bigtime Networks Inc.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1000512131117.15185A-100000@sabis.org> <011101bfbc3e$1ee4ab40$dd29680a@tgt.com>
Sender: cal@chmls11.mediaone.net

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
> 
> I would think that 8mb would be a bit small if you have a high bandwidth
> connection such as a cable modem.  However, it just might work fine.  I ran
> a similar setup in 20MB.

8mb is plenty when you're pretty much only running the kernel anyway. ;)
4 would probably do it...

My firewall was a 12mb 486dx66 with a 300mb drive, now its a 16mb Alpha
133 with 200mb HD. The 486 swapped less. ;)

References:
- Compact Slackware
  - From: Jonathan Kline <jonathankl@sabis.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:17576] gpm?
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:17578] Partition: swap
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:17600] Compact Slackware
Next by thread: Recycling Hdwr
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread