RE: [TCLUG:15263] Reading Red Hat rpms

["Schlough, Mark" <Mark.Schlough@nmb.norwest.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jim Crumley [SMTP:crumley@belka.space.umn.edu]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 29, 2000 10:11 AM
> To:	tclug-list@mn-linux.org
> Subject:	Re: [TCLUG:15263] Reading Red Hat rpms
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:08:48PM -0600, Schlough, Mark wrote:
> > I've seen many-a-message complaining about the "evility" of rpms.  I've
> even
> > asked for a side by side comparison of rpm vs deb but never gotten a
> > response.
> 
> Seems like you got plenty of opinions on deb vs. rpm vs tar.gz, 
> but here's a nice web page comparing them :
> http://www.kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp/old.html
	[Schlough, Mark]  
	Thank you, finally a side by side comparison.  After looking at it
though I wonder whether the data is based on rpm 2.0 or 3.0

	Mark