Re: [TCLUG:15239] UltraEdit

To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:15239] UltraEdit
From: "Andrew S. Zbikowski" <andyzib@ringworld.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:17:58 -0600
References: <3.0.5.32.20000327194109.0096c510@g-swan.email.umn.edu> <3.0.5.32.20000328093853.009bb760@g-swan.email.umn.edu>

http://www.ringworld.org/~zibby/Screenshots/AtWork.jpg

Replying to the right message helps...

Decent SSH Client (SecureCRT has emacs options) plus a windows Xserver
(X-Win pro from Labtam) work well enough for me. Now if I could only find
some spare 10/100 cards we'd really be flying. Who am I kidding...this end
of the network will be stuck on 10baseT until we upgrade to gigabit ethernet
(cough...never)

Granted, it's not cheap if you want to be legit about it...no other
comments.

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:15239] UltraEdit (When you're stuck in Windoz and needemacs)
  - From: George Swan <g-swan@maroon.tc.umn.edu>
- Re: [TCLUG:15239] UltraEdit (When you're stuck in Windoz and needemacs)
  - From: George Swan <g-swan@maroon.tc.umn.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:15246] Re: [TCLUG-ANNOUNCE:62] Meeting speaker for TCLUG meeting on April 8thy
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:15253] Ride needed to conf from near downtown Mpls
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:15239] UltraEdit (When you're stuck in Windoz and needemacs)
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:15227] <OT> M$ Access rant and bug warning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread