Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP

[Scott Dier - dieman <dieman@ringworld.org>]

Bingo, just think. Make server-side sorting (configurable via a web
interface) and IMAP usage a *premium* option.  Or something to make your
offering value-added.

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Andrew S. Zbikowski wrote:

> IMAP in an office situation would be so perferable. No lost e-mail,
> server side sorting, etc. 
> 
> FOr an ISP, pop still makes sence...do you really want to have 5000+
> users keeping their e-mail on your server? 
> 
> 

-- 
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> #nicnac@efnet 612.301.0265
http://www.ringworld.org/  finger:dieman@destiny.ringworld.org

[msg(SuperQ)] what about seven?
[SuperQ] not my kind of movie
[SuperQ] I don't like that crap
[SuperQ] it's a horror flic
[SuperQ] I work on NT
[SuperQ] I don't need any more horror in my life