Re: [TCLUG:14628] RE: Napster

[Dave Sherohman <esper@usinternet.com>]

Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom said:
> >If Napster uses a standard set of ports for client-client communication, 
>         therein lies the problem.. it doesn't. it takes whatever ports are
> available. :)

Say...  If Napster uses random ports, does that mean that you could at least
kill off servers by putting a masquerading box in the way?  Not a practical
solution for the vast majority of non-house/apartment networks, but just an
idea that occurred to me when I read that...

-- 
Geek Code 3.1:  GCS d- s+: a- C++ UL++$ P+>+++ L++>++++ E- W--(++) N+ o+ !K
w---$ O M- !V PS+ PE Y+ PGP t 5++ X+ R++ tv- b++ DI++++ D G e* h+ r++ y+