Re: [TCLUG:14215] using OpenSSH

["Thomas.Veldhouse (Exchange)" <Thomas.Veldhouse@target.com>]

I have my doubts as to the reality of that statment.  I believe the true
reason was that it wanted to become GNOME compliant, and to do that, would
for the most part - make it more portable (the aim of GNOME is to be an Open
Source UNIX desktop - not just an Open Source Linux desktop).

Any other platform specific issues are taken care of by the maintainer of
the FreeBSD port (vanilla@FreeBSD.ORG) and has nothing to do with Raster.

Oh yes ... I appreciate the sarcasm.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@visi.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Christopher Palmer <reid@pconline.com>
To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:14215] using OpenSSH


> On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Thomas.Veldhouse (Exchange) wrote:
> 
> > I think that Linux is lucky.  OpenBSD built OpenSSH for OpenBSD.  The
fact
> > that others want it is incidental.  It ports easily to the other *BSD.
They
> > were nice enough to port it to Linux.
> 
> I think FreeBSD is lucky. Raster built Enlightenment for Red Hat Linux.
> The fact that others want it is incidental. It ports easily to the other
> Linux distributions. He was nice enough to port it to FreeBSD.
> 
> 
> --
> Christopher Reid Palmer : www.innerfireworks.com
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>