Re: [TCLUG:18575] speaking of NFS....

To: Dan Debertin <danield@bitstream.net>
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:18575] speaking of NFS....
From: Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 22:40:25 -0500
Cc: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0006032053530.268-100000@dmitri.bitstream.net>; from danield@bitstream.net on Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 08:57:41PM -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0006032053530.268-100000@dmitri.bitstream.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i

* Dan Debertin <danield@bitstream.net> [000603 20:54]:
> that a) worked the same as NFS, because NFS is nothing but a badly
> implemented Good Idea, and b) wasn't so awful in terms of ease of

NFSv3 is pretty fast.  And when you use NIS and a global uid/gid space
your fine on many networks.

-- 
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> #nicnac@efnet 
http://www.ringworld.org/  finger:dieman@destiny.ringworld.org

Wait. Watch. Wonder.
	-J

http://sluggy.com/d/971226.html

References:
- speaking of NFS....
  - From: Dan Debertin <danield@bitstream.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:18559] DNS and Apache Server
Next by Date: ATI acceleration.
Prev by thread: speaking of NFS....
Next by thread: Debian + gnome
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread