TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:18386] XFree86 4.0 servers
- To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
- Subject: Re: [TCLUG:18386] XFree86 4.0 servers
- From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:42:34 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <3934F8E2.E43AED6E@tcfreenet.org>; from lerwick@tcfreenet.org on Wed, May 31, 2000 at 06:34:58AM -0500
- References: <20000531022736.A31555@enchanter.real-time.com> <3934F8E2.E43AED6E@tcfreenet.org>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 06:34:58AM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> Note as far as ATI goes:
>
> All chips supported in 3.3.6 are supported in 4.0 except for Mach8
> and some old Mach32 chips. The support in 4.0 is, however,
> unaccelerated for all chips except the Rage 128.
>
> This suprises me, as common as ATI cards are... I can't live without
> acceleration. ;)
I sorry, but this doesn't surprise me in the least. ATI has never
been forthcoming with their card specs, and I doubt they ever will be.
Perhaps in three or four years when Linux lives on a much larger
market share will they start turning their heads. ATI sucks anyway.
I've never been impressed with their cards. When 3dfx stepped onto
the block, ATI was but in a long dark shadow they can't seem to crawl
out from behind.
I'm not bitter. Really. <blink, blink>
--
Chad "^chewie, gunnarr" Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>
http://wookimus.net/chewie
PGP signature