Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:17:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990719092913.20009B-100000@newton.pconline.com>; from Chris Kesler on Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 09:49:34AM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
References: <19990718233104.A17257@wizard.real-time.com> <Pine.LNX.3.95.990719092913.20009B-100000@newton.pconline.com>

Quoting Chris Kesler (chris@pconline.com):
> Seems to me that if we're going to use this information to bash USR
> modems, we should be a little more careful.  I should mention that I have
> no affiliation with USR.

No bashing intended, no trolling intended. Just an interesting website that
came across the Ascend Users mailing list.

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
  - From: Nate Carlson <natecars@infiniteloop.com>

References:
- Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
  - From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
  - From: Chris Kesler <chris@pconline.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
  - From: Chris Kesler <chris@pconline.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
Next by Date: Sound help requested
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:7010] Has 3Com abandoned V.90 client modem improvements?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread