Re: CF: Why is 6x6 the minimum map size in crossedit?

To: crossfire mailing list <crossfire@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: Re: CF: Why is 6x6 the minimum map size in crossedit?
From: Anthony Thyssen <anthony@cit.gu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:57:55 +1000
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:03:25 PST." <199901190603.AA15352@tesla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: owner-crossfire@ifi.uio.no

Peter Mardahl on  wrote...
| 
| Is there any particular reason for this?  For the
| random map generator, I'd like to include verbatim
| tiny maps into the map I'm generating:  a 3x3 would
| be useful even, but 6x6 is inconveniently large for
| some things.
| 
| so, um, why 6x6?
| 
Hmm -- hack the map file with an editor
and see what crashes :-)


  Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer )    http://www.sct.gu.edu.au/~anthony/
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
        ``Sorry 'bout that Chief!''
        ``Missed it, by that much!''          -- Get Smart
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
     PGP Public Key available -- finger -l anthony@lyrch.cit.gu.edu.au
-
[you can put yourself on the announcement list only or unsubscribe altogether
by sending an email stating your wishes to crossfire-request@ifi.uio.no]

References:
- CF: Why is 6x6 the minimum map size in crossedit?
  - From: Peter Mardahl <peterm@langmuir.EECS.Berkeley.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: CF: Re: Temples / Maps Update
Next by Date: CF: Why is this line in readable.c, line 1357?
Prev by thread: CF: Why is 6x6 the minimum map size in crossedit?
Next by thread: Re: CF: Why is 6x6 the minimum map size in crossedit?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread