Crossfire Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CF: win32 client and XPM



>
>> server, to easy client implementation. Just because platform foo
>> supports "PNG" as a native format doesn't mean we should use PNG ---
>> after all, platform bar probably supports YYT as it's native format,
>> so why not add YYT as well? PNG is a lot more difficult to read, so
>> using PNG instead of XPM means that the client implementation for _one_
>> platform is slightly simplified (since no image conversion is needed),
>> while adding a lot more work for all the other client programmers.
>
>> Remember, Windooze is not the only platform. Make it simple for
>> everybody, not just for Windows-Programmers.
>
>	I too more or less agree with this. THe format of the 
>	images sent from the server should be in the simplest,
>	*least bandwidth* impacting format. We should highly prize
>	performance over ease of implementation (server side).

I've found that PNG images are about 1/2 the size of XPM
images. ASCII based format does not necessarily imply
it is the simpilest best format...

	-Scott
[to unsubscribe etc., send mail to crossfire-request@ifi.uio.no]


Follow-Ups: References: