Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130

To: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130
From: Miles Lott <milos@insync.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 20:14:06 -0600 (CST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980129140206.009b4100@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
> The P130 and the P220 really are aimed at a different use. The P130 supports
> dial-up ISDN or SW56 as well as the FT1 interface. It could be used for
> backup, overflow, or independently. The P220 only has "dedicated" point-to-
> point (FT1), or Frame Relay interfaces.

Then the 220 better work with T1, eh? ;)
We bought the 130 with plans to go T1 a few months later.  It was also
pushed by the ISP, which is wierd since they use Cisco/ADC on their end.

Yes the main overriding reason was it was cheaper, at a time when we were
trying to justify (nasty word) ourselves.  I was lax in pushing for the
Cisco I wanted.  Anyway, so far so good.  Who knows what the next step
will be in the coming months?  Some of the discussion on the local ISP
group is pretty exciting as far as new formats to be available in town.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P75s and 5.1
Next by Date: (ASCEND) sick of lost of route problem with max4k
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread