Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) Quiescenting PRIs
On Friday, January 23, 1998 10:39 AM, Matt Holdrege [SMTP:matt@ascend.com] wrote:
[snip]
| >
| >We are the CO. Our TNT's are directly connected to a Nortel DMS
| >500. The alarms are minor invconveniences to the RBOC CO, but
| >the alarm is an out so I can't say I blame them for not liking
| >it.
| >
| >Our experience has been the queise<sp!> is not reliable. Perhaps
| >I should revisit this.
|
| The way this works is that we send CUSTOM messages to the switch telling it
| to take the channel out of service. The reason the messages are custom is
| that there is no standard method to do this. I forwarded a request through
| the NIUF to add this feature to (North American) National ISDN. I don't
| know the status though.
|
| So we built this custom feature originally for the 5ESS. Later we added it
| for the DMS-100. Does the DMS-500 use the same ISDN code?
Sure does.
The DMS-500 is nothing more than a DMS-100 and a DMS-250 code load.
And quiescing will work - only for 4 minutes, then the switch expects to
see the BLO you are sending it again. The reason being, per the ANSI
Timer standards, you must send this BLO every 4/5 minutes.
Shawn Lewis
XCOM Technologies, Inc
slewis@xcom.net
|
| Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
| ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
| To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
| To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: