Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity

To: "Chris A. Epler" <cepler@esinet.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NL.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 22:44:42 +0100
cc: Mike Hughes <mike@dircon.net>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 19 Jan 1998 16:12:51 -0500. <Pine.LNX.3.96.980119161215.8984D-100000@fantasia.stormhaven.org>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

    On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:

    > Yes, We know these problems. Customers often only see the absolute
    > numbers and they complain, forgetting that the local telecom only
    > garantees 9600 connect speed (used to be 2400). However we do see quite
    > a lot of connects on 33600.

    9600 baud perhaps, but baud != bits per second.

When I posted this, I knew someone was going to make this remark. Note
I didn't specify baud or bps. That's what the phone company also isn't
always clear about.  Sometime they speak over 2400 baud, then they
mention 9600 bps, sometime they just say 9600b. It really depends to
whom you talk.

	jaap
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity

From: ascend@digistar.com

References:

Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity

From: "Chris A. Epler" <cepler@esinet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0b2 for the Pipelines - Correction
Next by Date: (ASCEND) 6.0b2 for the Pipelines - Correction
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread