Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) The comparison of 4048 to PM3
And I've personally done my own comparison of those same units. Nothing
was as flexible, reliable, configurable, or as stable as the MAX4000 we
tested was. Granted, we had key features we had to have implemented, and
the Ascend met everyone of them. Sure, some were better in all categories
as the Ascend, but overall the MAX was the best product.
Regards,
Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
Fortune: "When in doubt, do as the President does... Lie." - Anonymous
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
> Ascend sales do have access to an informal rebuttal to the testing. We do
> not want to get into a full-bore name-calling match on the 'net over tests
> that many customers just don't take any notice of anyway.
>
> Look at it this way, LanQuest, The Tolley Group as well as various Magazine
> review teams have reviewed the MAX40xx, USR-TC, AS5x00, PM3 (more recently)
> and in each case the results were different. In many cases, the vendor
> who sponsored the test always came out on top (I'm making no accusations
> here, just observations). Draw your own conclusions.
>
> Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: