Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) Big modem pool
That also depends on your telco, as Southwestern Bell refuses to provide a
DS3 worth of PRI. We get something similar from Time Warner, but it's
ATM. We just pull PRI (as well as DS3 of bandwidth and a frame-relay
connection) off an OC-3 circuit. Lead times on PRI installations are
basicly "When do we need it up," which is nice for growing pools and
capacity planning.
Regards,
Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
Fortune: 43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can go wr
fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core dumped
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Steve LaDuke wrote:
> Have you considered using TNTs instead?
>
> Then you could get your PRIs over T3 lines. I would think that the
> real-estate, power, and leased line savings would really add up.
>
> I don't have need of one myself.
>
> Steve LaDuke.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Balbach [SMTP:stephen@clark.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 1998 11:32 AM
> > To: ascend-users@bungi.com
> > Subject: (ASCEND) Big modem pool
> >
> >
> > We plan on having about 30 Max 4XXX's in 1 modem pool (about 60 PRI's)
> >
> > Are there any scaleability issues?
> >
> > For 2B bonding, what ethernet switch is required to allow MAC layer
> > security?
> >
> > Thanks for any help or experiences.
> >
> > Stb
> >
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to
> > ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: