Re: (ASCEND) Unsettable 4048 idle-timeout?

To: Ascend Users <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Unsettable 4048 idle-timeout?
From: Andre Beck <beck@ibh.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 08:59:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980423124828.954A-100000@toons.undergrid.net>; from Jeremy T. Bouse on Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 12:49:42PM -0400
Organization: IBH Prof. Dr. Horn GmbH - Xlink PoP Dresden
References: <3.0.32.19980423081511.00ca9a34@infocom.net> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980423124828.954A-100000@toons.undergrid.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 12:49:42PM -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> 	Okay... so what else would be the advantage of upgradin to the .4
> code from .2 ? I must have fail'd to see any other mention of the new
> release as this is the first time I've seen it mention'd...

If you have any filters: The filter leak we noticed in 6.0.0 and .2
should be fixed in .4 - on boxes with lots of filters this could eat
up memory on a large scale.

-- 

Kanther-Line: PGP SSH IDEA MD5 GOST RIPE-MD160 3DES RSA FEAL32 RC4

+-o-+--------------------------------------------------------+-o-+
| o |               \\\- Brain Inside -///                   | o |
| o |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^                       | o |
| o | Andre' Beck  (ABPSoft)   AB10-RIPE   XLink PoP Dresden | o |
+-o-+--------------------------------------------------------+-o-+
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Unsettable 4048 idle-timeout?

From: Daniel Pancamo <pancamo@infocom.net>

Re: (ASCEND) Unsettable 4048 idle-timeout?

From: "Jeremy T. Bouse" <undrgrid@undergrid.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Checking status of E1 WAN via SNMP
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Unsettable 4048 idle-timeout?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread