Re: (ASCEND) Load balancing with GRF

To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Load balancing with GRF
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 1998 11:56:03 -0700
Cc: Andy Walden <andy@enigma.mtco.com>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199804051149.MAA24617@genesis.DOMINO.ORG>
References: <Your message of "Sat, 04 Apr 1998 13:08:26 -0800." <3.0.5.32.19980404130826.0098e6d0@darla.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 12:49 PM 4/5/98 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>On Sat, 04 Apr 1998 13:08:26 -0800 
> Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what you mean. The GRF doesn't have T1 interfaces. If you are
>> using FR over HSSI into a CSU that supports T1, then I still wouldn't see
>> what the problem is?
>
>When will the GRF have a T1 and E1 interface? 

AFAIK, no dates have been set.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Load balancing with GRF

From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) NAT, Pipe75, stops routing.
Next by Date: (ASCEND) OSPF Max4k <-> Linux-ISDN
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Load balancing with GRF
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) Load balancing with GRF
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread