Re: (ASCEND) mpp maximum channels?

To: Phillip Vandry <vandry@mlink.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) mpp maximum channels?
From: Kevin A Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 15:42:06 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199809282237.SAA13232@Iodine.Mlink.NET>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 28 Sep 1998 15:03:45 EDT." <Version.32.19980928150228.00fcc1a0@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 03:37 PM 9/28/98 , Phillip Vandry wrote:
>> >I was testing my RADIUS server to correctly accept/reject analog
>> >multilink sessions based on the username, and I decided to up the
>> >Base Channel Count to see what would happen.
>> >
>> >I can't imagine it would work very nicely, of course!
>> 
>> Did you *try* any throughput tests to check....?
>
>No, I didn't. It's mostly the delay that I would expect would be crappy,
>as multilink does not help delay (yes, it's possible to fragment packets,
>but over 7 or 8 links there's probably a lot of overhead involved!)

The MAX (in fact all Ascend products) do NOT fragment over MP. We will
handle receiving fragmented MP frames, but we do not send them.


Kevin Smith			(kevin@ascend.com)
Ascend Communications...
	...where Network Solutions never end.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) mpp maximum channels?

From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@mlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) mpp maximum channels?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) mpp maximum channels?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Using Pipeline to accept multiple inbound calls?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread