Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(ASCEND) Re: Lan security error woes


I also should mention that the problem usually doesn't follow a specific
user. We're talking like 20 users this happens on, which, under normal
conditions, get online fine.
I tried with a test account, when loaded, got the error. Later, when not
loaded, let me on no problem.

-Tony
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco                           Network Administrator/Engineer
admin@intergrafix.net                        Intergrafix Internet Services

          "The best way to predict the future, is to invent it."
http://cygnus.ncohafmuta.com                    http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.

 On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, System Administrator wrote:

> 
> Hello fellow listers,
> 
> New to the list. Hope you can help with my problem.
> 
> SITUATION:
> We got here a Max 4048 with 5, 16 port (yes, 5) modem cards in it and 3
> ISDN PRI lines installed, NFAS'd with 1 D-channel.
> Code is v6.0.2
> Users dialing in are analog users at 56k or below.
> Authentication is via a 3com RADIUS and accounting server on NT. DB is sql
> (access 97) with ODBC drivers. Relevant RADIUS attribute values that
> RADIUS is sending are FRAMED_ADDRESS = "255.255.255.254" USER_SERVICE_TYPE
> = 2 FRAMED_PROTOCOL = 1 FRAMED_ROUTING = 0 FRAMED_COMPRESSION = 1
> 
> IP pools are as follows:
> Pool#                Base         Count      InUse
>    1             205.147.217.1      59         20
>    2           205.147.217.193      62          0
>  Number of remaining allocated addresses:    0
> 
> PROBLEM:
> When the box gets busy (65+ users), users are dropped off right after they login.
> Error is "LAN security error". In syslog, disconnect code is 101, progress
> code is 67. When activity drops, <55 users, errors almost all but 
> disappear.
> 
> I'd upgrade to a newer code to see if it fixes it, but it doesn't look
> like there's a way to turn off V.90 in it, is there?
>  (we run both Kflex and X2 servers and have found V.90 to be too unstable)
> 
> our max4004 with 2 PRIs and 4 12 port cards has no problem with these LAN
> errors, nor have problems on our X2 boxes. (this kind of problem anyway, i
> wont even go into how bad Total Control hubs are)
> 
> 
> Any help is appreciated. Thanx,
> 
> -Tony
> .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
> Anthony J. Biacco                           Network Administrator/Engineer
> admin@intergrafix.net                        Intergrafix Internet Services
> 
>           "The best way to predict the future, is to invent it."
> http://cygnus.ncohafmuta.com                    http://www.intergrafix.net
> .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
> 
> 
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: References: