Re: (ASCEND) DAMN 6.1.7

To: Cliff Emberg <cliff@nlife.com>, ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) DAMN 6.1.7
From: Kevin A Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 15:38:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980921131109.00fe3df4@nlife.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 01:11 PM 9/21/98 , Cliff Emberg wrote:
>
>   Makes me wonder what we are doing right... 

Keeping quiet...Oops...you just blew it!

>Max 4048, 6.1.7, 37.5 days uptime, no mem or pool leaks,
>no fe's, warnings, or reboots.
>
>No ospf or stacking, just modem users, has ~40 users on
>during peak times.

It seems that OSPF is the major culprit where we have seen this
reset with no FE, or FE 29. Jason and Neale however are seeing
something different, and both have engineering teams involved
with their sites.

Kevin Smith			(kevin@ascend.com)
Ascend Communications...
	...where Network Solutions never end.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) DAMN 6.1.7

From: Cliff Emberg <cliff@nlife.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 Reboot no Fe.
Next by Date: (ASCEND) email problem using NAT
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) DAMN 6.1.7
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) DAMN 6.1.7
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread