Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 Microcode for Max
Good and medium, with only one catastrophe <FX: sounds of wood being touched>
The first box I upgraded hasn't missed a beat (almost 2 weeks). The second
one (which is more heavily loaded) died once (Warning 140 followed by
multiple Warning 179s and eventual refusal to authenticate via radius - we
elected to reboot, all within 1 hour) and is running a little low on memory
(pools -v in Daig mode shows ~600k). Overall, I'm happy. Certainly we are
yet to identify modem connection or disconnection problems from userland.
Note that we are not using OSPF or Stacking. Add either/both of these and YMMV.
Regards,
Neale.
At 09:13 31/08/98 -0500, Rob Myers wrote:
>Good and bad.
>
>So far we have only had one reboot where the Max's ethernet stopped
>responding (it was a voluntary reboot actually) and a bunch of FE 1001,
>1006, and 1007s.
>
>That only happened once, however.
>
>Aside from that everything is going okay. No particular complaints from
>modem users about disconnects, throughput issues, etc..
>
>Haven't had it running enough to comment on how well v.90 is working.
>
>Seems "almost" as stable as 5.0Ap48 (we'll see in another 100 days or so
>if they're still up *grin*)
>
>-Rob-
>
>
>> From: root <root@shell.ntrnet.net>
>> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 11:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
>> Subject: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 Microcode for Max
>>
>> So what is the general concensus about this release of code??? I have
>> only seen a few negative things posted regarding problems with this
>> release, but had seen a lot of good regarding this release. I am
>> considering upgrading this weekend to this code release, and was wondering
>> if others are still seeing major problems.
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> Jim
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: