Re: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?

[Tim Connolly <tec@mountain.net>]

Actually I think my CS staff has the USR's pinned down with their init strings.
I don't hear too many complaints anyway... I was just using USR as an example.

Neal Rigney wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Connolly <tec@mountain.net>
> To: ascend-users@bungi.com <ascend-users@bungi.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 6:17 PM
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?
>
> [snippage]
>
> >187  - this guys modem sucks, must be USR
>
> I dislike Sportsters as much as the next guy, but we've had _extremely_ good
> performance with the v.90 code.  We've seen STABLE speeds as high as 50667
> with them.
>
> --
> Neal Rigney, PERnet Communications, (409)729-4638
> neal@mail.pernet.net
> "I've seen better bandwidth between two gorillas with flash cards!"



-- Tim Connolly tec@mountain.net     MountainNet, Inc.
-- (304) 594-9075 ext. 37            2816 Cranberry Square
-- fax (304) 594-9088                Morgantown, WV 26505

-- If you sit down at a poker game and don't see a sucker,
-- get up.  You're the sucker. (Story of my life)


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?
• From: "Neal Rigney" <neal@pernet.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP Variable for Current Channels In Use?
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) [Fwd: Mwave fix - Apache modem and V.xx]
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread