Re: (ASCEND) DNS resolution bug

To: Jesse Martinez <jmartine@ecis.com>, "Leon McCalla" <ascend@caribbeanlink.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) DNS resolution bug
From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 13:10:01 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980511221122.6456B-100000@ecis.com>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980511113429.00a75b10@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 10:12 PM 5/11/98 -0700, Jesse Martinez wrote:
>So what is Ascend going to do about this. I'm getting IRC users that can't
>get to certain servers because of this.

I had stated:

>> We have considered processing what we could (the first 512 bytes) and
>> ignoring the TC bit.  But that could have unpredictable consequences.
>> The alternative is also unpredictable, since virtually no one else
supports 
>> the TCP option, even if we did, it most likely wouldn't work.

To make it clear: we are considering which one of these approaches to take.

*Constructive* feedback is appreciated.


Kevin Smith			Ascend Communications...
Customer Satisfaction	...where Network Solutions never end.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) DNS resolution bug

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) DNS resolution bug

From: Jesse Martinez <jmartine@ecis.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) V.90 beta..Brett
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Full duplex on Max 6000?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) DNS resolution bug
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) DNS resolution bug
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread