Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) Is this a correct strategy to utilise Ascend enterprise SNMP extensions?
I am sorry if this is not considered the correct place to make this
posting. Getting ones first exposure to enterprise SNMP on a MAX box is
hardly ideal, given the sparseness of relevant documentation.
I am trying to access SNMP Ascend enterprise extensions on our MAX
4000E, particularly session extensions.
An 'snmpwalk' walk on our MAX produces many ASN numbers without
equivalent MIB OID names.
I tried using the complete ascend.mib from maxutils, this made no
difference. I tried simply adding in the current Ascend ascend.mib and
session.mib to a default MIB, hoping to see OIDs containing the string
'sessionStatusGroup'. No luck.
Either I an doing this incorrectly or the operating system version on
our MAX does not support supplying this information.
The operating system is version 4.6C. If I upgraded to 5.0Ai28 or 6.0.2
would this fix the problem? I know an upgrade is well advised anyway.
This brings me to other question. Is it safer to stay with 5.0Ai28 (or
another version) than with 6.0.2? If 6.0.2 is advised, is the following
upgrade path safe: 4.6C to 5.0A to 6.02?
Thanks in advance.
John
--
John Heenan
Systems Engineer ATI/Firstnet
webmaster@atinet.com.au
http://www.atinet.com.au/webmaster.htm
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: