Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) IP Addresses needed for 4048
It rotates through the pool.
Phil's arguments work VERY well here (been using pool summary and /26 nets
for
a while here.
Larry Rosenman
--
Larry Rosenman, Sr. System Administrator, CyberRamp Internet Services
E-Mail: ler@cyberramp.net, http://www.cyberramp.net
Voice: (214) 343-3333/(817) 461-8484 (Metro)/Fax: (214) 343-3727
Technical Support: (214) 340-2020/(817) 226-2020 (Metro)
U.S. Mail: 11350 Hillguard Rd, Dallas, TX 75243-8311
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
[mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jim Howard
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 1998 11:04 AM
To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) IP Addresses needed for 4048
At 09:18 1998/03/31 -0500, Phillip Vandry wrote:
>> Why give more than 48 addresses. It only has 2 T-1's available so at a
>> max that's 48 connections.
>- If you have more addresses than channels, then even if all your
>channels are constantly used, addresses get to have a little "rest"
>between uses. This means that if the previous user logged off
>uncleanly, possibly leaving some TCP connections open or otherwise
Does the system actually rotate through the pool like this?
I had always assumed that it took the first available
starting at lowest address and working up...
-Jim H
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: