Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) IP Addresses needed for 4048
I have been using the pool for a year with no problem. I give it the
starting address and then 48 for the count. Now I do use a cisco for
routing which is a /26 pointing to the maxes.
Bennie
>
>Because for pool summary to work, it has to be a valid netblock (power of
>2) which 48 addresses is not. 32 (/27) or 64 (/26) will do, but 32
>leaves you with 18 modems with no IP. You could try VLSM and use a /27
>and a /28 for 48 addresses, but you lose 2 IPs per network leaving you
>with 44 IPs, not 48. I also don't know if VLSM works on the Ascend side.
>In theory, I guess you could get passed VLSM by using a /27 from one /24
>and a /28 from another, but you still get stuck being 4 IP addresses
>short.
>
>Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
>NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
>
>On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Bennie Warren wrote:
>
>> Why give more than 48 addresses. It only has 2 T-1's available so at a
>> max that's 48 connections.
>>
>> Bennie
>
**************************************
Bennie Warren /\
LemooreNet / /
320 West D Street / /
Lemoore, CA 93245 / / /\ /\
Phone: 209.924.5909 / /_ _ / \ / /
Fax 209.924.9578 \ _ _ / /\ \/ /
bennie@lemoorenet.com / / \ /
http://www.lemoorenet.com /_/ \/
**************************************
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: