Re: (ASCEND) TNT 2.0 Reports

["Tom Gwilt" <tgwilt@suite224.net>]

One of our TNTs has 192 dial up ports. It is usually running over 100
simultaneous connections. Throughput is excellent, routes stay up, and we
have _never_ experienced the problems you describe. This particular unit is
using CT1s with no ISDN.

Another TNT has 5 T1 PRIs, with room for 3 more. This unit also has a heavy
load along with 3 LANs connected via ISDN. The usual user base is in the
90 - 100 range. No problems once again.

These units were implemented with 2.0. I recently uploaded the 2.0.3 release
with no noticeable deleterious changes.

HTH

Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Mitch Harhay <mitch@bighorn.accessnv.com>
To: ascend-users@bungi.com <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Date: Friday, March 27, 1998 8:21 PM
Subject: (ASCEND) TNT 2.0 Reports


>Hello,
>
>I am about to upgrade my TNT to software 2.0.  I am curious as to if how
>version 2.0 has been working for other people in production modes.  We
>currently use the TNT for 96 dial-up ports, it seems to really bog down
>when the box gets busy (75+ users).  Authentication stops, throughput
>lags, and sometimes packets don't even get routed -- the TNT forgets the
>user is still alive.
>
>I guess I just want to get a feel for what I can expect when I upgrade.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Mitch Harhay
>Access Nevada, Inc.
>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap48
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) TNT 2.0 Reports
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Client DNS
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread