Re: (ASCEND) Another Test: MAX6000 (fwd)

[Vesa Halkka <vhalkka@cc.helsinki.fi>]

> 
> >  It would be really nice to get a NON-BIASED report, But hell, When your 
> 
> NON-BIASED report? What's that?
> 
> What exactly are you going to test?
> 
> The test that started this thread (60 modems downloading at full tilt
> going to an FTP server on the local Ethernet) is probably not a good
> aproximation of actual usage and maybe the winning box performs badly
> in a more 'normal' environment.

I had the opportunity to test 3 boxes with my real users. It's the only way
to do it. Of course there could be a test which would include
both authentications, and a bursty load with varying packet size.

A box that *did* well in a ftp download test did not survive with my
real users.. which use only average 1kb/s each.

VesA
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) caller id on PRI
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 voice call features
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Another Test: MAX6000 (fwd)
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Max 6000?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread