Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.0 on a Max

To: skozicki@bluestar.net
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.0 on a Max
From: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 13:10:46 -0800
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Mar 1998 08:47:05 CST." <350E8CE9.515A@bluestar.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> > They have, actually, as of 5.0Ap42.  We have *no* problems related to OSPF
> > in 5.0Ap42; the only issue we have is a very slow memory leak.
> 
> That would mean it's *NOT* fixed. =)

Ah, but it's not clear that the memory leak has anything to do with OSPF!  In
fact, I believe (without much hard evidence) that it's related to stacking.

--
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO				     +1-702-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc.			fax: +1-702-348-9412
PGP Key fingerprint = 03 2D A8 4A 37 07 FB 53  EB C9 02 5C E5 10 66 F2


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.0 on a Max

From: Scott Kozicki <skozicki@bluestar.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.0 on a Max
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.0 on a Max
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread