RE: (ASCEND) RIP2 on MAX4000

To: "Rogers, Kirk" <Kirk.Rogers@trw.com>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) RIP2 on MAX4000
From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:51:21 +0000
CC: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: <E9779051BFDFD111A0DB000092A79A570E98FD@exsp01.sp.TRW.COM>
Priority: normal
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On 23 Jul 98 at 7:08, Rogers, Kirk wrote:

> Do any of you running 'RIPV2-Both' to Cisco's have more than one MAX?
> We have to MAX 4004's running side by side w/RIPV2-Both and are seeing
> routing delays up to 30 seconds before dial-up VLSM's (P75's w/29 bit
> masks) get their routes propagated.  

Nope, we are sending RIP only.

Sending and recieving RIP with more than a couple of Maxen seems to 
slow things right down.

Are the Cisco's picking the routes up OK, and just the Maxen which 
are having problems?

I guess that if their ISDN disconnects, and reconnects on a different 
MAX, before the RIP hold-down timer has expired, then their new route 
will be slow getting installed.

Regards,
Mike
-- 
Mike Hughes - Network Services         mike@dircon.net
Tel: 0181 297 0300                     http://www.dircon.net/
Fax: 0181 463 9820
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) RIP2 on MAX4000

From: "Rogers, Kirk" <Kirk.Rogers@trw.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) # of users currently on a MAX?
Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) Caller-ID Attribute missing
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) RIP2 on MAX4000
Next by thread: (ASCEND) installing access control on nt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread