Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max

To: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:09:47 -0700
Cc: Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@pointer.teuto.de>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199807161808.LAA01505@owl.greatbasin.net>
References: <Your message of "Tue, 14 Jul 1998 19:18:07 PDT." <3.0.5.32.19980714191807.00b6ddc0@darla.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 11:08 AM 7/16/98 -0700, Bruce Robertson wrote:
>I haven't had the guts to try the new NSSA feature... OSPF on 6.1.3 dies
>frequently enough as it is (memory allocation errors, something that was
>fixed back in 5.0Ap48, if I remember correctly).

If you use NSSA, you will be using less memory, eh?


Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max

From: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 3COM Dual Analog Office Connect
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread