Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Re: TFTP with NAT (WAS Pipeline 85)
As you can see below the IP address assigned by the max does not show up.
Also the Pipeline is running Nat and the tftp server is behind the
pipeline.
Thanks for the info. I found that setting the set def server on the
pipeline to the machine I wanted to be the tftp server it worked
flawlessly. As the max assigns the address all the time I started using
MaxStat to find the address. I would think just like most networking I
should be able to see the address somewhere that the max is assigning it.
But I guess not. Anyway it works fine now.
Bennie
ascend% show ip route
Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age
0.0.0.0/0 100.100.100.100 wan6 Sn 100 1 4141 45910
100.100.100.0/24 100.100.100.100 wan6 rTn 100 1 0 45910
100.100.100.0/24 100.100.100.100 wan6 *SG 120 7 0 177543
100.100.100.100/32 100.100.100.100 wan6 rTn 100 1 0 45910
100.100.100.100/32 100.100.100.100 wan6 *S 120 7 2 177543
127.0.0.0/8 - bh0 CP 0 0 0 177543
127.0.0.1/32 - local CP 0 0 0 177543
127.0.0.2/32 - rj0 CP 0 0 0 177543
192.168.100.0/24 - ie0 C 0 0 57520 177543
192.168.100.100/32 - local CP 0 0 68 177543
224.0.0.0/4 - mcast CP 0 0 0 177543
224.0.0.1/32 - local CP 0 0 0 177543
224.0.0.2/32 - local CP 0 0 0 177543
224.0.0.5/32 - bh0 CP 0 0 0 177543
224.0.0.6/32 - bh0 CP 0 0 0 177543
224.0.0.9/32 - local CP 0 0 0 177543
255.255.255.255/32 - ie0 CP 0 0 4 177543
>>Is the Pipeline running NAT or the MAX? Where is the tftp server -- on
>>the max side or the PL side? A typical config would be to have a PL
>>running NAT calling into a max and to have the tftp server on the max
>>side. If this is the case, you can use tsave accross NAT and you can also
>>do tloadcode across the NAT.
>
>Really? Every time I've tried TFTPing on a Pipe using NAT to a Max (with
>the TFTP server on the Max side as you say), it's never worked at all. It
>just times out. It works fine on subnet-routed connections, so I always
>assumed it was yet another reason to dislike NAT. I also assumed it could
>be fixed with a static mapping, but I've never gone that far. The less I
>think about NAT, the happier/less irritated I am.
>
>Peter Lalor Infoasis
>plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/
>415-459-7991 x102 415-459-7992 fax
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
**************************************
Bennie Warren /\
LemooreNet / /
320 West D Street / /
Lemoore, CA 93245 / / /\ /\
Phone: 209.924.5909 / /_ _ / \ / /
Fax 209.924.9578 \ _ _ / /\ \/ /
bennie@lemoorenet.com / / \ /
http://www.lemoorenet.com /_/ \/
**************************************
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>