Re: (ASCEND) Slow e-mail send when using NAT on P75

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Slow e-mail send when using NAT on P75
From: "Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 01:02:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <f13dff312289@news.allcon.net> <0733adeec59d@news.allcon.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980202 (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.33 (i586))

In article <0733adeec59d@news.allcon.net> you wrote:

>Seems to me that having a static mapping to the P75 would make more sense,
>then, since it would give a "connection refused" message too, you wouldn't
>have to staticly map every computer on the network. :)

That's what I tried a few days ago, I used the Ethernet Address of a P50
for the fake auth mapping and it didn't work. It does however work when
the mapping points to a running machine in the LAN, preferrably one that
is always up. A network printer will do just fine :)
If anyone successfully mapped the port to the pipeline, I'd very much
like to know which release you did it with.

-- 
Oliver J. Albrecht <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Strange Message on Pipeline
Next by Date: (ASCEND) P-50 dialup into Max 4000
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Slow e-mail send when using NAT on P75
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Re:Unable to Route
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread