Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.10 for Max
That is where I was coming from, shouldn't they be working with 6.1.x and not
backwards to 6.0.x?
Lars Marowsky-Brée wrote:
> On 1998-08-06T11:32:50,
> kevin <kevin.b@flash.net> said:
>
> > There's 3 versions that are actively being developed.
> >
> > 6.0.x
> > 6.1.x
> > 7.0beta
>
> I don't understand.
>
> I do understand that 7.0 is the version which will cure all, make the sun
> shine and the rain stop etc (much like Cisco IOS 12.x).
>
> I thought 6.1.x was the new "latest" stuff.
>
> How does 6.0.x fit ? Isn't it obsoleted by 6.1.x? Shouldn't development
> focus on 6.1.x?
>
> What is the major difference between 6.1 and 6.0 ?
>
> Sincerely,
> Lars Marowsky-Brée
>
> --
> Lars Marowsky-Brée
> Systems Management
>
> teuto.net Netzdienste GmbH - DPN Verbund-Partner
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: