OK, I'm confused, I must have missed Kevin's message, Is there a bug?? HDLC? ap27? say what? I've heard if you initiate a HDLC call into a ap27 the box will explode. :) Actually, I'm concerned, cause I'm about 3 hours away from deploying this into my network. Can anyone confirm if there is an issue on HDLC calls? -Jason On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Dave Van Allen wrote: > Umm, HDLC problem, high priority in engineering? Kevin, this guessing > game is not good. > > What's the scope on this before I end up finding out by accident on our > customers? Was this TR in the engineering release for p25? or > introduced in the p27 code? > > Nothing personal Kevin, but simply responding to a message with a > police-squad "Don't worry Sir, we'll have the road open soon" message is > very, well it's just wrong. > > Best regards, > > David Van Allen - FASTNET(tm) / You Tools Corporation > dave@fast.net (888)321-FAST(3278) <A HREF="http://www.fast.net">http://www.fast.net</A> > FASTNET - Business and Personal Internet Solutions > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Kevin Smith [SMTP:kevin@ascend.com] > >Sent: Monday, September 29, 1997 4:12 PM > >To: Ascend User-Group > >Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0ap27???? > > > >At 10:55 AM 9/29/97 -0700, Matt Holdrege wrote: > >>At 01:38 PM 9/29/97 -0400, Rick Wagner wrote: > >>>Has the HDLC problem from Ap16, been corrected in Ap27? > >> > >>What HDLC problem? > > > >TR#2554. Open, high-priority in Engineering. > > > > > >Kevin > > > > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > >To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09285.html">(ASCEND) 5.0Ap27 and the HDLC problem</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09217.html">RE: (ASCEND) 5.0ap27????</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09225.html">Re: (ASCEND) 50Ap27 ISDN bug?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09222.html">Re: (ASCEND) NAT on P75 for 200 workstations (yeah, really...)</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09217.html">RE: (ASCEND) 5.0ap27????</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09285.html">(ASCEND) 5.0Ap27 and the HDLC problem</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail3.html#09223"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd182.html#09223"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>