> couldn't this be that Ascend gear is notoriously bad when it comes to > making ICMP a priority? I mean, when my Maxen are busy, they're almost dead > to the world as far as a ping is concerned, yet I get 2 T1's full bore when > I check the SNMP meters. yeah, but that's GOOD :) Keeps stupid things like ICMP from taking your whole network down... ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09125.html">Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09048.html">Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Scott Kozicki <SKozicki@bluestar.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09107.html">Re: (ASCEND) Lost wan ports 3 & 4</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09105.html">Re: (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #809</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09048.html">Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09125.html">Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#09104"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd176.html#09104"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>